Examples of stellar objects that fit the induction theory of the Ball-of-Light Particle Model: Examples of stellar objects that fit the induction theory of the Ball-of-Light Particle Model:
There is another critical prediction from the Ball-of-Light Particle Model. It predicts that as a wave sweeps from pole to pole over the surface of a spherical ball-of-light, the spin of the wave will change direction at the equator.
graphics from Table A
Furthermore, the ejected balls-of-light would perpetuate these spins.
graphics from Table A that show smaller ejected particles with the same spin
Thus, the particles ejected from one pole would have a spin opposite from the particles ejected from the opposite pole.
This is important because it would provide a relatively simple way to test the Ball-of-Light Particle Model. As the ejected balls-of-light decay, they will give off light that should be polarized to some degree in opposite directions.
Graphic of decaying ball-of-light that are giving off polarized light
The classical theory for creating "jets" and ejecting "blobs" from stellar objects would predict that the light from the ejected objects would have the same polarization -- not opposite polarization. According to classical theory, stellar objects are made from collapsing primordial clouds of hydrogen and helium. [The Ball-of-Light Particle Model predicts stellar objects are decaying balls-of-light -- not collapsing clouds of primordial hydrogen and helium.] As the clouds collapse, according to classical theory, they form disks -- accretion disks. The disks spin around the core like a top. The disks have a hole on the top and bottom like the hole in a donut.
Graphic of accretion disk
Somehow, the mere presence of these holes allow the core to eject material. Some mechanism ejects material through the holes at speeds close to the speed of light.
graphic of an accretion disk ejecting material
Keep in mind, the massive gravitational field of the core is pulling material into the core. Classic theory predicts that if the core is a Black Hole, then the material reaches the speed of light right when it hits the core. Therefore, somehow, some of the material has the ability to turnaround and, not only escape the massive gravitational pull the core, but escape at speeds sometimes approaching the speed of light.
First of all, I have never heard a satisfactory description of a mechanism that would explain why material that is being pulled into a black hole -- or some other object with massive gravitational pull -- would suddenly wish to change direction and shoot out the holes of an accretion disk.
graphic of infalling material changing direction against the pull of the core's massive gravitational pull, add a big question mark.
However, for this argument, it really doesn't matter if material can or can not be ejected from the holes of an accretion disk. If the disk is spinning, it must be spinning in one direction. (I have never heard of any argument that the accretion disk is not spinning, or has two spins, each in opposite directions.) Since traditional theory would have an accretion disk spinning in one direction only, the "blobs" ejected from opposite poles would spin in the same direction. Thus traditional theory would predict that the polarization of the two jets would be the same -- exactly opposite from the Ball-of-Light Particle Model.
graphic contrasting the two polarizations
If you are a scientist that has already studied the polarization of the material ejected from such objects please E-mail me.
There are many objects in space where this can be tested:
Each of these objects is ejecting material in the opposite direction -- in a bipolar fashion. In each object the light coming from the two sides should reach earth with a polarization, and the polarization should, to some degree, be polarized in opposite directions.