This page will have the main links on the subject of earthquakes.
Note: Expands Collapses
Are you aware that earthquakes can be predicted? Maybe not as well as everybody would like, but a lot better than is generally known.
A new method can be used to predict which days are more likely to have earthquakes, and a new technology can be used to electronically detect and predict the real-time danger of real-time breaking rock. Essentially, this new technology works at the speed of light.
I propose a new earthquake warning system be developed. It will use both the old seismometers and the new electronic sensors. It will use an fuzzy logic built into the upgradable software to analyze the current risk. It will broadcast the information on old systems like radio and TV, and new systems like the internet, cell phones, and smart watches.
My Statistics on Predicting High Risk Dates for Killer Earthquakes
Yearly Earthquake Charts:
As of 6/4/2004, I have totaled the numbers for people killed by earthquakes from 2000 through 2004. These numbers are provided by the United States Geological Service. In column 1 is the year. In column 2 is the total number of deaths from earthquakes during my Earthquake Watches. In column 3 is the total number of deaths from earthquakes. In column 4 is the percent of deaths during Earthquake Watches.
Deaths during my
|2004||(As of 6/4/2004) 645 (Year not tallied yet.)||715||90.2%|
|2005||Tsunami ~283,100 (Year not tallied yet.)||~283,100||not yet calc|
|2008||248 (Large China quake did not occur during Watch.)||69,612||0.4%|
| Totals &
Professional seismologists would consider me an amateur or even a crackpot. They publicly scorn and ridicule any attempts at predicting dates of higher risk for earthquakes. In some places, there are even laws prohibiting predicting earthquakes. This seems ridiculous to me. What would you think if meteorologists analyzed the weather — especially for hurricanes, dangerous thunderstorms, and tornadoes — and then just simply did not tell the public about their predictions?
If you live in an area that has a high risk for earthquakes, I will leave it up to you to decide if there is a correlation in my assessments for earthquake risks.
Hello, my name is John Nordberg. Welcome to my site. It is a very old website going through some growing pains. I hope you enjoy my vision of time, the grand unification of physics, the solution to fusion energy, a new solution for getting fresh water in hot deserts, and a solution to global warming.Follow @johntnordberg
Solar X-rays & Geomagnetic Field:
Data from: N3KL.org
Source: Current Solar Data
Prediction of current World-Wide Earthquake Risk:
Physics, Time, What is Time?, Grand Unification, GUT, Theory of Everything, TOE, The Speed-of-Light Definition of Time, The Ball-of-Light Particle Model, John Nordberg, Photons, Relativity, Astronomy, Desert Oasification Atmospheric Water Generators, DOAWG, Fusion, Fusion Energy, NFT
This 3-dimensional, geometric equation, is the key to unifying physics. Basically, it states that if you take the “cross product x“ of the electric field vector E and the magnetic field vector B, the result is the gravitational field vector G.Do not confuse the gravitational field “vector G“ (it has a small arrow above it) with the Gravitational constant (which is represented by a big "G" without a vector arrow above it) or with gravitational acceleration (which is represented by just a small "g").